January 22 , 2026
Menu
Ease Your Nursing Academic Journey with Nursing Whispers. Get custom Assignments, Homework, Research Papers and Classes done at competitive Prices. We'll do the Heavy-Lifting.
Choose two DNP Essentials, describe them, and exemplify them within your work area.( Primary Care Clinic)
Contribute a minimum of 500 words. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA. within the past 5 years with doi #
THE assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIO OR AI TEXT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE, ATTACH BOTH REPORT PLEASE, SCHOOLS USE VERY GOOD TOOL TO IDENTIFY THEM.
due date January 22, 2026 no later
CHECK GRAMMAR AND SPELLING TO AVOID LOSE POINTS PLEASE
2 PAGES
RUBRIC ATTACHED
– Official Assignment Rubric – Official Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Professi onalism Concept Applicat ion
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The student meets less than 70% of the required content
20 pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Gramm ar Written Commu nication
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
20 pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Commu nication Specific Formatti ng
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the
20 pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Critical and Logical Thinkin g Thought analysis process
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well- thought process. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary
20 pt s
Total Points: 100
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Academ ic Literacy Quality of Sources and APA Citation s
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The following criteria would apply, supporting information
20 pt s
